Version Details and Security Vulnerabilities

📦

@swc/core

1.2.205

Comparision Betweeen 1.2.205 and 1.2.204

Identify the differences between the current version of the package and the previous one.

Version

Dependencies

Dev Dependencies

Peer Dependencies

Distributed Files

Unpacked Size

522.42 KB

519.25 KB

Version 1.2.205 Details

@swc/core version 1.2.205 represents a subtle but potentially impactful update over its predecessor, 1.2.204. Both versions, described as a "super-fast alternative for Babel," share an identical dependency structure, including platform-specific binaries for diverse architectures like Darwin, FreeBSD, Android, Linux (GNU and MUSL), and Windows, ensuring broad compatibility. Similarly, the extensive suite of development dependencies remains consistent, featuring popular tools like Jest, Acorn, Axios, Husky, Mocha, React, and TypeScript. These tools are pivotal for testing, code analysis, and building robust applications leveraging @swc/core.

The core difference lies in the potential for minor bug fixes, performance enhancements, or internal refactoring within the underlying Rust-based compilation engine of SWC. While the package manifests don't explicitly detail these changes, the bump in version number suggests improvements.

For developers already using @swc/core, upgrading to 1.2.205 is generally recommended to benefit from any incremental improvements. The consistent dependency list indicates a low risk of breaking changes, making the update relatively safe. Developers considering @swc/core for the first time should opt for the latest version (1.2.205) to start with the most refined and optimized iteration. One important change is the slightly increased unpacked size after install from 531711 to 534961. Note that releaseDate changed as well, the latest version has been published around a week later compared to the older one. SWC continues to be a valuable asset for those seeking faster JavaScript/TypeScript compilation speeds, particularly in large projects where build times can be a bottleneck.

Security Vulnerabilities

This site is an independent open-source project and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by npm, Inc. or GitHub, Inc. The name “npm” is a registered trademark of npm, Inc., used here solely to describe compatibility and reference publicly available npm package data.