Version Details and Security Vulnerabilities

📦

dmd

5.0.0

Comparision Betweeen 5.0.0 and 4.0.6

Identify the differences between the current version of the package and the previous one.

Version

Dependencies

Dev Dependencies

Peer Dependencies

Distributed Files

Unpacked Size

57 KB

56.99 KB

Security Vulnerabilities

This site is an independent open-source project and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by npm, Inc. or GitHub, Inc. The name “npm” is a registered trademark of npm, Inc., used here solely to describe compatibility and reference publicly available npm package data.

Version Details and Security Vulnerabilities

📦

dmd

5.0.0

Comparision Betweeen 5.0.0 and 4.0.6

Identify the differences between the current version of the package and the previous one.

Version

Dependencies

Dev Dependencies

Peer Dependencies

Distributed Files

Unpacked Size

57 KB

56.99 KB

Security Vulnerabilities

Security Details

Comprehensive list of direct or transitive vulnerabilities for version 5.0.0 of the package dmd.

All Security Vulnerabilities

All the vulnerabilities related to the version 5.0.0 of the package

Summary:

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked

Details:

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it?

Denial of service.

The regular expression inline.reflinkSearch may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings. PoC is the following.

import * as marked from 'marked';

console.log(marked.parse(`[x]: x

\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](`));

Who is impacted?

Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through marked and does not use a worker with a time limit.

Patches

Has the problem been patched?

Yes

What versions should users upgrade to?

4.0.10

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

Do not run untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a worker thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

https://marked.js.org/using_advanced#workers
https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Open an issue in marked

Details about marked@0.7.0

Summary:

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked

Details:

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it?

Denial of service.

The regular expression block.def may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings. PoC is the following.

import * as marked from "marked";

marked.parse(`[x]:${' '.repeat(1500)}x ${' '.repeat(1500)} x`);

Who is impacted?

Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through marked and does not use a worker with a time limit.

Patches

Has the problem been patched?

Yes

What versions should users upgrade to?

4.0.10

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

Do not run untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a worker thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

https://marked.js.org/using_advanced#workers
https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Open an issue in marked

Details about marked@0.7.0

Security Details

Comprehensive list of direct or transitive vulnerabilities for version 5.0.0 of the package dmd.

All Security Vulnerabilities

All the vulnerabilities related to the version 5.0.0 of the package

Summary:

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked

Details:

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it?

Denial of service.

The regular expression inline.reflinkSearch may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings. PoC is the following.

import * as marked from 'marked';

console.log(marked.parse(`[x]: x

\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](`));

Who is impacted?

Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through marked and does not use a worker with a time limit.

Patches

Has the problem been patched?

Yes

What versions should users upgrade to?

4.0.10

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

Do not run untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a worker thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

https://marked.js.org/using_advanced#workers
https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Open an issue in marked

Details about marked@0.7.0

Summary:

Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked

Details:

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it?

Denial of service.

The regular expression block.def may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings. PoC is the following.

import * as marked from "marked";

marked.parse(`[x]:${' '.repeat(1500)}x ${' '.repeat(1500)} x`);

Who is impacted?

Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through marked and does not use a worker with a time limit.

Patches

Has the problem been patched?

Yes

What versions should users upgrade to?

4.0.10

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

Do not run untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a worker thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

https://marked.js.org/using_advanced#workers
https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

Open an issue in marked

Details about marked@0.7.0

Version Details and Security Vulnerabilities

dmd

Comparision Betweeen 5.0.0 and 4.0.6

Security Vulnerabilities

Version Details and Security Vulnerabilities

dmd

Comparision Betweeen 5.0.0 and 4.0.6

Security Vulnerabilities

Security Details

All

Transitive Dependencies

Package

All Security Vulnerabilities

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

For more information

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

For more information

Security Details

All

Transitive Dependencies

Package

All Security Vulnerabilities

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

For more information

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

For more information

Version Details and Security Vulnerabilities

dmd

Comparision Betweeen 5.0.0 and 4.0.6

Security Vulnerabilities

Version Details and Security Vulnerabilities

dmd

Comparision Betweeen 5.0.0 and 4.0.6

Security Vulnerabilities

Security Details

All

Transitive Dependencies

Package

All Security Vulnerabilities

marked@0.7.0 GHSA-5v2h-r2cx-5xgj 7.5

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

For more information

marked@0.7.0 GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf 7.5

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

For more information

Security Details

All

Transitive Dependencies

Package

All Security Vulnerabilities

marked@0.7.0 GHSA-5v2h-r2cx-5xgj 7.5

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

For more information

marked@0.7.0 GHSA-rrrm-qjm4-v8hf 7.5

Impact

Patches

Workarounds

References

For more information