Rollup Plugin PostCSS offers seamless integration between Rollup and PostCSS, streamlining workflows for developers using both tools. Version 1.4.0 and its predecessor, version 1.3.4, share a common goal: simplifying CSS processing within Rollup projects. Both versions boast identical dependency lists, including crucial packages like cssnano for CSS optimization, postcss for core transformations, and postcss-modules enabling modular CSS. Key developer tools are also consistent between versions, such as Autoprefixer managing vendor prefixes, and testing frameworks like Jest.
However, subtle updates distinguish the two versions. While the core functionality remains the same, version 1.4.0 has a slightly larger unpacked size (35464 bytes) compared to version 1.3.4 (34502 bytes), suggesting internal improvements or minor feature additions. These additions are probably fixing a bug or adding a certain functionality without modifying dependency versions. Although minute, these changes could translate to better performance or refined handling of specific CSS transformations, which is why the update is important. The 1.4.0 version was also released a few days after 1.3.4, specifically on March 18, 2018, while the older version came out on March 14, 2018. Developers should update to the newest version for the latest improvements and bug fixes.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 1.4.0 of the package
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
The is-svg package 2.1.0 through 4.2.1 for Node.js uses a regular expression that is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS). If an attacker provides a malicious string, is-svg will get stuck processing the input.
ReDOS in IS-SVG
A vulnerability was discovered in IS-SVG version 4.3.1 and below where a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDOS) occurs if the application is provided and checks a crafted invalid SVG string.
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDOS)
In the npm package color-string, there is a ReDos (Regular Expression Denial of Service) vulnerability regarding an exponential time complexity for
linearly increasing input lengths for hwb() color strings.
Strings reaching more than 5000 characters would see several milliseconds of processing time; strings reaching more than 50,000 characters began seeing 1500ms (1.5s) of processing time.
The cause was due to a the regular expression that parses hwb() strings - specifically, the hue value - where the integer portion of the hue value used a 0-or-more quantifier shortly thereafter followed by a 1-or-more quantifier.
This caused excessive backtracking and a cartesian scan, resulting in exponential time complexity given a linear increase in input length.
Regular Expression Denial of Service in postcss
The package postcss versions before 7.0.36 or between 8.0.0 and 8.2.13 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) via getAnnotationURL() and loadAnnotation() in lib/previous-map.js. The vulnerable regexes are caused mainly by the sub-pattern
\/\*\s* sourceMappingURL=(.*)
var postcss = require("postcss")
function build_attack(n) {
var ret = "a{}"
for (var i = 0; i < n; i++) {
ret += "/*# sourceMappingURL="
}
return ret + "!";
}
postcss.parse('a{}/*# sourceMappingURL=a.css.map */') for (var i = 1; i <= 500000; i++) {
if (i % 1000 == 0) {
var time = Date.now();
var attack_str = build_attack(i) try {
postcss.parse(attack_str) var time_cost = Date.now() - time;
console.log("attack_str.length: " + attack_str.length + ": " + time_cost + " ms");
} catch (e) {
var time_cost = Date.now() - time;
console.log("attack_str.length: " + attack_str.length + ": " + time_cost + " ms");
}
}
}
PostCSS line return parsing error
An issue was discovered in PostCSS before 8.4.31. It affects linters using PostCSS to parse external Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). There may be \r discrepancies, as demonstrated by @font-face{ font:(\r/*);} in a rule.
This vulnerability affects linters using PostCSS to parse external untrusted CSS. An attacker can prepare CSS in such a way that it will contains parts parsed by PostCSS as a CSS comment. After processing by PostCSS, it will be included in the PostCSS output in CSS nodes (rules, properties) despite being originally included in a comment.