@nuxt/vite-builder versions 3.13.1 and 3.13.0 represent incremental updates to the Vite bundler specifically designed for Nuxt applications. While both versions share a similar core functionality, a closer look reveals key distinctions that can impact developer workflows.
The most notable change lies in the updated dependencies. Version 3.13.1 upgrades vite from 5.4.2 to 5.4.3, @nuxt/kit from 3.13.0 to 3.13.1, postcss from 8.4.41 to 8.4.44, @vitejs/plugin-vue from 5.1.2 to 5.1.3 and unplugin from 1.12.2 to 1.12.3. These dependency bumps likely incorporate bug fixes, performance improvements, and new features within those respective packages. Also, version 3.13.0 has vue version 3.4.38 while version 3.13.1 does not specify the exact version, indicating that it might be tied to the peer dependency specified ^3.3.4.
Developers should note these updated dependencies, especially if their projects leverage specific features or rely on certain behaviors of these underlying tools. Testing your application after upgrading is always advisable to ensure compatibility and identify any potential issues arising from the dependency changes. Also, because @nuxt/kit was updated, it's possible that some build configurations or module interactions may need slight adjustments. This package remains focussed on giving Nuxt developers the best and most up-to-date building experience leveraging the power of Vite. The fileCount and unpackedSize does not change by much between versions, which means that both versions should perform around the same.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 3.13.1 of the package
Opening a malicious website while running a Nuxt dev server could allow read-only access to code
Nuxt allows any websites to send any requests to the development server and read the response due to default CORS settings.
While Vite patched the default CORS settings to fix https://github.com/vitejs/vite/security/advisories/GHSA-vg6x-rcgg-rjx6, nuxt uses its own CORS handler by default (https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/pull/23995).
https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/blob/7d345c71462d90187fd09c96c7692f306c90def5/packages/vite/src/client.ts#L257-L263
That CORS handler sets Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
.
[!IMPORTANT]
If on an affected version, it may be possible to opt-out of the default Nuxt CORS handler by configuringvite.server.cors
.
nuxt dev
.http://localhost:3000/_nuxt/app.vue
(fetch('http://localhost:3000/_nuxt/app.vue')
) from a different origin page.Users with the default server.cors option using Vite builder may get the source code stolen by malicious websites
/__nuxt_vite_node__/manifest
/ /__nuxt_vite_node__/module
also seems to have Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
, so it maybe also possible to exploit that handler.
https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/blob/7d345c71462d90187fd09c96c7692f306c90def5/packages/vite/src/vite-node.ts#L39
Although I didn't find a valid module id.
Note that this handler is probably also vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks as I didn't find any host header checks.
esbuild enables any website to send any requests to the development server and read the response
esbuild allows any websites to send any request to the development server and read the response due to default CORS settings.
esbuild sets Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
header to all requests, including the SSE connection, which allows any websites to send any request to the development server and read the response.
https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/df815ac27b84f8b34374c9182a93c94718f8a630/pkg/api/serve_other.go#L121 https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/df815ac27b84f8b34374c9182a93c94718f8a630/pkg/api/serve_other.go#L363
Attack scenario:
http://malicious.example.com
).fetch('http://127.0.0.1:8000/main.js')
request by JS in that malicious web page. This request is normally blocked by same-origin policy, but that's not the case for the reasons above.http://127.0.0.1:8000/main.js
.In this scenario, I assumed that the attacker knows the URL of the bundle output file name. But the attacker can also get that information by
/index.html
: normally you have a script tag here/assets
: it's common to have a assets
directory when you have JS files and CSS files in a different directory and the directory listing feature tells the attacker the list of files/esbuild
SSE endpoint: the SSE endpoint sends the URL path of the changed files when the file is changed (new EventSource('/esbuild').addEventListener('change', e => console.log(e.type, e.data))
)The scenario above fetches the compiled content, but if the victim has the source map option enabled, the attacker can also get the non-compiled content by fetching the source map file.
npm i
npm run watch
fetch('http://127.0.0.1:8000/app.js').then(r => r.text()).then(content => console.log(content))
in a different website's dev tools.Users using the serve feature may get the source code stolen by malicious websites.