Express version 4.19.2 is a minor update to the popular Node.js web application framework, building upon the solid foundation of version 4.19.1. While both versions maintain the core characteristics of express – fast, unopinionated, and minimalist – a closer look reveals subtle but potentially impactful differences. The dependency lists for both versions appear identical, suggesting that the core functionality and included middleware haven't undergone significant changes. Developers relying on specific middleware versions can expect consistent behavior between the two releases.
However, the dist object provides some clues. The unpackedSize varies slightly, with 4.19.2 being smaller (214763 bytes compared to 215018 bytes in 4.19.1). This seemingly small difference might indicate bug fixes, performance improvements, or minor code optimizations within the core express library itself. The releaseDate also sets them apart, indicating a newer version, which usually includes such changes. Additionally, the updated version usually includes security patches, making it advisable to developers.
For developers, upgrading from 4.19.1 to 4.19.2 should be relatively straightforward, given the consistent dependencies. However, it's always best practice to review the changelog (available on the Express.js GitHub repository) for a detailed breakdown of the modifications. Also, developers should run their test suits after the upgrade to check functionality matches expectations. Even minor version bumps can sometimes introduce unexpected behavior due to subtle changes in the underlying code. Overall, version 4.19.2 appears to be a refined and potentially more efficient iteration that benefits from the previous version's stability.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 4.19.2 of the package
express vulnerable to XSS via response.redirect()
In express <4.20.0, passing untrusted user input - even after sanitizing it - to response.redirect() may execute untrusted code
this issue is patched in express 4.20.0
users are encouraged to upgrade to the patched version of express, but otherwise can workaround this issue by making sure any untrusted inputs are safe, ideally by validating them against an explicit allowlist
successful exploitation of this vector requires the following:
send vulnerable to template injection that can lead to XSS
passing untrusted user input - even after sanitizing it - to SendStream.redirect() may execute untrusted code
this issue is patched in send 0.19.0
users are encouraged to upgrade to the patched version of express, but otherwise can workaround this issue by making sure any untrusted inputs are safe, ideally by validating them against an explicit allowlist
successful exploitation of this vector requires the following:
cookie accepts cookie name, path, and domain with out of bounds characters
The cookie name could be used to set other fields of the cookie, resulting in an unexpected cookie value. For example, serialize("userName=<script>alert('XSS3')</script>; Max-Age=2592000; a", value) would result in "userName=<script>alert('XSS3')</script>; Max-Age=2592000; a=test", setting userName cookie to <script> and ignoring value.
A similar escape can be used for path and domain, which could be abused to alter other fields of the cookie.
Upgrade to 0.7.0, which updates the validation for name, path, and domain.
Avoid passing untrusted or arbitrary values for these fields, ensure they are set by the application instead of user input.
body-parser vulnerable to denial of service when url encoding is enabled
body-parser <1.20.3 is vulnerable to denial of service when url encoding is enabled. A malicious actor using a specially crafted payload could flood the server with a large number of requests, resulting in denial of service.
this issue is patched in 1.20.3
serve-static vulnerable to template injection that can lead to XSS
passing untrusted user input - even after sanitizing it - to redirect() may execute untrusted code
this issue is patched in serve-static 1.16.0
users are encouraged to upgrade to the patched version of express, but otherwise can workaround this issue by making sure any untrusted inputs are safe, ideally by validating them against an explicit allowlist
successful exploitation of this vector requires the following:
path-to-regexp outputs backtracking regular expressions
A bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For example, /:a-:b.
For users of 0.1, upgrade to 0.1.10. All other users should upgrade to 8.0.0.
These versions add backtrack protection when a custom regex pattern is not provided:
They do not protect against vulnerable user supplied capture groups. Protecting against explicit user patterns is out of scope for old versions and not considered a vulnerability.
Version 7.1.0 can enable strict: true and get an error when the regular expression might be bad.
Version 8.0.0 removes the features that can cause a ReDoS.
All versions can be patched by providing a custom regular expression for parameters after the first in a single segment. As long as the custom regular expression does not match the text before the parameter, you will be safe. For example, change /:a-:b to /:a-:b([^-/]+).
If paths cannot be rewritten and versions cannot be upgraded, another alternative is to limit the URL length. For example, halving the attack string improves performance by 4x faster.
Using /:a-:b will produce the regular expression /^\/([^\/]+?)-([^\/]+?)\/?$/. This can be exploited by a path such as /a${'-a'.repeat(8_000)}/a. OWASP has a good example of why this occurs, but the TL;DR is the /a at the end ensures this route would never match but due to naive backtracking it will still attempt every combination of the :a-:b on the repeated 8,000 -a.
Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and can lead to a DoS. In local benchmarks, exploiting the unsafe regex will result in performance that is over 1000x worse than the safe regex. In a more realistic environment using Express v4 and 10 concurrent connections, this translated to average latency of ~600ms vs 1ms.
path-to-regexp contains a ReDoS
The regular expression that is vulnerable to backtracking can be generated in versions before 0.1.12 of path-to-regexp, originally reported in CVE-2024-45296
Upgrade to 0.1.12.
Avoid using two parameters within a single path segment, when the separator is not . (e.g. no /:a-:b). Alternatively, you can define the regex used for both parameters and ensure they do not overlap to allow backtracking.
