Marked version 0.1.6 is a minor update to the popular markdown parsing library, following version 0.1.5. Both versions share the same core purpose: to provide developers with a fast and efficient way to convert Markdown syntax into HTML. The library is designed for speed, making it suitable for use in applications requiring real-time markdown rendering or processing large amounts of markdown content.
While the description, dependencies, and repository details remain consistent between versions 0.1.5 and 0.1.6, the key difference lies in the release date. Version 0.1.6 was released on January 15, 2012, approximately 11 days after version 0.1.5, released on January 4, 2012. This relatively short interval suggests that version 0.1.6 likely addresses minor bugs, incorporates small improvements, or includes crucial security patches identified shortly after the release of the previous version.
For developers, this means upgrading from 0.1.5 to 0.1.6 is recommended to ensure optimal performance, stability, and security. While the specific changes in version 0.1.6 aren't explicitly detailed in the provided metadata, such quick updates often revolve around addressing edge cases or vulnerabilities. Since both versions lack listed dependencies, integration into existing projects should be straightforward, minimizing potential conflicts. Developers prioritizing a robust and actively maintained markdown parser will likely benefit from utilizing the latest available version within the 0.1.x series.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 0.1.6 of the package
Multiple Content Injection Vulnerabilities in marked
Versions 0.3.0 and earlier of marked
are affected by two cross-site scripting vulnerabilities, even when sanitize: true
is set.
The attack vectors for this vulnerability are GFM Codeblocks and JavaScript URLs.
Upgrade to version 0.3.1 or later.
VBScript Content Injection in marked
Versions 0.3.2 and earlier of marked
are affected by a cross-site scripting vulnerability even when sanitize:true
is set.
[xss link](vbscript:alert(1))
will get a link
<a href="vbscript:alert(1)">xss link</a>
Update to version 0.3.3 or later.
Regular Expression Denial of Service in marked
Versions 0.3.3 and earlier of marked
are affected by a regular expression denial of service ( ReDoS ) vulnerability when passed inputs that reach the em
inline rule.
Update to version 0.3.4 or later.
Sanitization bypass using HTML Entities in marked
Affected versions of marked
are susceptible to a cross-site scripting vulnerability in link components when sanitize:true
is configured.
This flaw exists because link URIs containing HTML entities get processed in an abnormal manner. Any HTML Entities get parsed on a best-effort basis and included in the resulting link, while if that parsing fails that character is omitted.
For example:
A link URI such as
javascript֍ocument;alert(1)
Renders a valid link that when clicked will execute alert(1)
.
Update to version 0.3.6 or later.
Marked vulnerable to XSS from data URIs
marked version 0.3.6 and earlier is vulnerable to an XSS attack in the data: URI parser.
Regular Expression Denial of Service in marked
Affected versions of marked
are vulnerable to a regular expression denial of service.
The amplification in this vulnerability is significant, with 1,000 characters resulting in the event loop being blocked for around 6 seconds.
Update to version 0.3.9 or later.
Marked allows Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attacks
Marked prior to version 0.3.17 is vulnerable to a Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attack due to catastrophic backtracking in several regular expressions used for parsing HTML tags and markdown links. An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by providing specially crafted markdown input, such as deeply nested or repetitively structured brackets or tag attributes, which cause the parser to hang and lead to a Denial of Service.
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked
What kind of vulnerability is it?
Denial of service.
The regular expression inline.reflinkSearch
may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings.
PoC is the following.
import * as marked from 'marked';
console.log(marked.parse(`[x]: x
\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](\\[\\](`));
Who is impacted?
Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through marked and does not use a worker with a time limit.
Has the problem been patched?
Yes
What versions should users upgrade to?
4.0.10
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
Do not run untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a worker thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources.
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Inefficient Regular Expression Complexity in marked
What kind of vulnerability is it?
Denial of service.
The regular expression block.def
may cause catastrophic backtracking against some strings.
PoC is the following.
import * as marked from "marked";
marked.parse(`[x]:${' '.repeat(1500)}x ${' '.repeat(1500)} x`);
Who is impacted?
Anyone who runs untrusted markdown through marked and does not use a worker with a time limit.
Has the problem been patched?
Yes
What versions should users upgrade to?
4.0.10
Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?
Do not run untrusted markdown through marked or run marked on a worker thread and set a reasonable time limit to prevent draining resources.
Are there any links users can visit to find out more?
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory: