All the vulnerabilities related to the version 3.15.2 of the package
Nuxt allows DOS via cache poisoning with payload rendering response
By sending a crafted HTTP request to a server behind an CDN, it is possible in some circumstances to poison the CDN cache and highly impacts the availability of a site.
It is possible to craft a request, such as https://mysite.com/?/_payload.json
which will be rendered as JSON. If the CDN in front of a Nuxt site ignores the query string when determining whether to cache a route, then this JSON response could be served to future visitors to the site.
An attacker can perform this attack to a vulnerable site in order to make a site unavailable indefinitely. It is also possible in the case where the cache will be reset to make a small script to send a request each X seconds (=caching duration) so that the cache is permanently poisoned making the site completely unavailable.
This is similar to a vulnerability in Next.js that resulted in CVE-2024-46982 (and see this article, in particular the "Internal URL parameter and pageProps" part, the latter being very similar to the one concerning us here.)
Nuxt has Client-Side Path Traversal in Nuxt Island Payload Revival
A client-side path traversal vulnerability in Nuxt's Island payload revival mechanism allowed attackers to manipulate client-side requests to different endpoints within the same application domain when specific prerendering conditions are met.
The vulnerability occurs in the client-side payload revival process (revive-payload.client.ts) where Nuxt Islands are automatically fetched when encountering serialized __nuxt_island
objects. The issue affects the following flow:
__nuxt_island
objectdevalue.stringify
and stored in the prerendered pagedevalue.parse
deserializes the payload/__nuxt_island/${key}.json
where key
could contain path traversal sequencesThis vulnerability requires all of the following conditions:
nitro.prerender
)useFetch
, useAsyncData
, or similar composables// Malicious API response during prerendering
{
"__nuxt_island": {
"key": "../../../../internal/service",
"params": { "action": "probe" }
}
}
This could cause the client to make requests to /__nuxt_island/../../../../internal/service.json
if path traversal is not properly handled by the server.
Action Required:
Temporary Workarounds (if immediate update is not possible):
The fix implemented validation for Island keys in revive-payload.server.ts
:
/^[a-z][a-z\d-]*_[a-z\d]+$/i
esbuild enables any website to send any requests to the development server and read the response
esbuild allows any websites to send any request to the development server and read the response due to default CORS settings.
esbuild sets Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
header to all requests, including the SSE connection, which allows any websites to send any request to the development server and read the response.
https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/df815ac27b84f8b34374c9182a93c94718f8a630/pkg/api/serve_other.go#L121 https://github.com/evanw/esbuild/blob/df815ac27b84f8b34374c9182a93c94718f8a630/pkg/api/serve_other.go#L363
Attack scenario:
http://malicious.example.com
).fetch('http://127.0.0.1:8000/main.js')
request by JS in that malicious web page. This request is normally blocked by same-origin policy, but that's not the case for the reasons above.http://127.0.0.1:8000/main.js
.In this scenario, I assumed that the attacker knows the URL of the bundle output file name. But the attacker can also get that information by
/index.html
: normally you have a script tag here/assets
: it's common to have a assets
directory when you have JS files and CSS files in a different directory and the directory listing feature tells the attacker the list of files/esbuild
SSE endpoint: the SSE endpoint sends the URL path of the changed files when the file is changed (new EventSource('/esbuild').addEventListener('change', e => console.log(e.type, e.data))
)The scenario above fetches the compiled content, but if the victim has the source map option enabled, the attacker can also get the non-compiled content by fetching the source map file.
npm i
npm run watch
fetch('http://127.0.0.1:8000/app.js').then(r => r.text()).then(content => console.log(content))
in a different website's dev tools.Users using the serve feature may get the source code stolen by malicious websites.
Opening a malicious website while running a Nuxt dev server could allow read-only access to code
Nuxt allows any websites to send any requests to the development server and read the response due to default CORS settings.
While Vite patched the default CORS settings to fix https://github.com/vitejs/vite/security/advisories/GHSA-vg6x-rcgg-rjx6, nuxt uses its own CORS handler by default (https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/pull/23995).
https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/blob/7d345c71462d90187fd09c96c7692f306c90def5/packages/vite/src/client.ts#L257-L263
That CORS handler sets Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
.
[!IMPORTANT]
If on an affected version, it may be possible to opt-out of the default Nuxt CORS handler by configuringvite.server.cors
.
nuxt dev
.http://localhost:3000/_nuxt/app.vue
(fetch('http://localhost:3000/_nuxt/app.vue')
) from a different origin page.Users with the default server.cors option using Vite builder may get the source code stolen by malicious websites
/__nuxt_vite_node__/manifest
/ /__nuxt_vite_node__/module
also seems to have Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *
, so it maybe also possible to exploit that handler.
https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/blob/7d345c71462d90187fd09c96c7692f306c90def5/packages/vite/src/vite-node.ts#L39
Although I didn't find a valid module id.
Note that this handler is probably also vulnerable to DNS rebinding attacks as I didn't find any host header checks.